- 27 - In determining whether a dwelling unit is a residence within the meaning of section 280A(a), section 280A(d)(1) provides in pertinent part: a taxpayer uses a dwelling unit during the taxable year as a residence if he uses such unit (or portion thereof) for personal purposes for a number of days which exceeds the greater of-- (A) 14 days, or (B) 10 percent of the number of days during such year for which such unit is rented at a fair rental. We have found that petitioners did not rent the Doon Way residence during 1997. The Doon Way residence constituted a “residence” within the meaning of section 280A(d)(1) only if petitioners’ use of the Doon Way residence for personal purposes exceeded 14 days during 1997. See sec. 280A(d)(1). At trial, Ms. Stoddard testified that the Doon Way residence was petitioners’ primary residence during 1997.15 On the instant record, we find that petitioners have failed to carry their burden of proving that their personal use of the Doon Way resi- dence did not exceed 14 days during 1997. On that record, we find that the Doon Way residence qualifies within the meaning of section 280A(d)(1) as petitioners’ “residence” during 1997. 15At trial, Ms. Stoddard also testified that “we were stay- ing on the boat [Quissett] right after the casualty loss [to the Quissett]. We had it in the boatyard. We were–-we were being stalked, and we basically moved out of the house and put it up for rent.” On the record before us, we find that petitioners have failed to establish (1) that they did not live in the Doon Way residence after the Quissett was seized and sold in May 1997 and (2) that during 1997 they owned property in addition to the Doon Way residence in which they resided.Page: Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011