Dieter Stussy - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         
          opportunity to petition this Court for a redetermination of that            
          deficiency.  Id.                                                            
               In Scar v. Commissioner, 814 F.2d 1363, 1368 (9th Cir.                 
          1987), revg. 81 T.C. 855 (1983), the Court of Appeals for the               
          Ninth Circuit held that respondent must consider information                
          relating to a particular taxpayer before respondent can be said             
          to have determined a deficiency with respect to that taxpayer.              
               For purposes of determining whether the notice of deficiency           
          provides sufficient information to apprise the taxpayer that the            
          Commissioner has determined a deficiency in tax, a notice of                
          deficiency includes the cover page and all attached pages and               
          documents.  Smith v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1979-16.                      
               If a notice of deficiency otherwise fulfills its purpose, we           
          have held that a mathematical error in the notice will not                  
          invalidate the notice where the taxpayer is not misled by the               
          error.  See Myers v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1981-84; see also             
          Smith v. Commissioner, supra.                                               
               Despite a trivial transposition error on the cover page of             
          the notice of deficiency, petitioner was adequately informed of             
          the income tax and issues in controversy by the notice of                   
          deficiency.  The petition indicates that petitioner was not                 
          misled by the transposition error; rather, petitioner was fully             
          aware of the typographical error’s existence.  The notice of                
          deficiency was not misleading and put petitioner on notice that             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011