- 2 - Respondent determined that petitioners are liable for additions to tax for taxable year 1983 under section 6653(a)(1) and (2) in the respective amounts of $198.20 and 50 percent of the interest due on a $3,964 deficiency. The issue for decision is whether petitioners are liable for these additions to tax.1 Background Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulations of fact and the attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference. Petitioners resided in Eatontown, New Jersey, on the date the petition was filed in this case. Petitioner husband (petitioner) has a bachelor’s degree and a master’s degree in electrical engineering and a doctorate in mathematics. In the year in issue, he was a full professor and the chairman of computer science and mathematics at Monmouth College. He has no academic background in finance or taxation and took only one course in economics as an undergraduate. Prior to the year in issue, petitioners had limited experience in making investments. 1In the petition, petitioners argued (1) that the deficiency upon which the additions to tax are based is incorrect, and (2) that petitioners “believe the statute of limitations has expired.” Petitioners did not address these issues at trial or in their posttrial memorandum of authorities. We therefore consider them to have been abandoned, and we need not address them here.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011