Gilfred B. and Patricia Swartz - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined that petitioners are liable for                  
          additions to tax for taxable year 1983 under section 6653(a)(1)             
          and (2) in the respective amounts of $198.20 and 50 percent of              
          the interest due on a $3,964 deficiency.  The issue for decision            
          is whether petitioners are liable for these additions to tax.1              
          Background                                                                  
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulations of fact and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by this reference.  Petitioners resided in              
          Eatontown, New Jersey, on the date the petition was filed in this           
          case.                                                                       
               Petitioner husband (petitioner) has a bachelor’s degree and            
          a master’s degree in electrical engineering and a doctorate in              
          mathematics.  In the year in issue, he was a full professor and             
          the chairman of computer science and mathematics at Monmouth                
          College.  He has no academic background in finance or taxation              
          and took only one course in economics as an undergraduate.  Prior           
          to the year in issue, petitioners had limited experience in                 
          making investments.                                                         




          1In the petition, petitioners argued (1) that the deficiency                
          upon which the additions to tax are based is incorrect, and (2)             
          that petitioners “believe the statute of limitations has                    
          expired.”  Petitioners did not address these issues at trial or             
          in their posttrial memorandum of authorities.  We therefore                 
          consider them to have been abandoned, and we need not address               
          them here.                                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011