- 6 -
On May 20, 1999, respondent received from petitioner a
request for the production of documents. By that request,
petitioner asked for “[a]ll records that Respondent intends to
use at trial to establish that the Sixteenth Amendment authorized
Congress to tax Petitioner’s income.”
By letter dated August 5, 1999, petitioner delivered to
respondent petitioner’s “Demand for Answers to a More Definite
Statement”, in which, among other things, petitioner demanded
answers to the following questions:
On the first page of the 1040 Instruction Booklet, the
Commissioner of the IRS states “Thank you for making
this nations’s tax system the most effective system of
voluntary compliance in the world”.
(1) Why does the Commissioner say that?
(2) What does that mean?
(3) And how does it affect the Demandant
[petitioner]?
* * * * * * *
Is the Untied States/Internal Revenue service, Honolulu
appeals Office #50089 in this case, in a condition of
bankruptcy? If so, what authority does the United
State/Internal Revenue Service, Honolulu Appeals Office
#50089 claim as a right to make a claim against the
Demandant in United States/Internal Revenue Service,
Honolulu Appeals Office #50089's name as a principal?
* * * * * * *
What facts are relied upon, if any, to assert that
Demandant is a citizen, state resident, juristic
person, or other legal person belonging to the Internal
Revenue Service, Honolulu Appeals Office #50089?
State all facts relied upon which would put the
Demandant in any venue, or jurisdiction other than one
of common law?
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011