Kyle L. and Carol B.Thornton - Page 6




                                        - 5 -                                         

          contributions and unreimbursed employee business expenses, which            
          Mr. Beltran grossly inflated.  The return prepared by Mr. Beltran           
          reflected an overpayment of $2,324.  Petitioners filed that                 
          return, and the $2,324 was subsequently refunded to them.                   
               For the year 2000, petitioner again prepared a draft return,           
          which he submitted to Mr. Beltran.  On the return prepared by Mr.           
          Beltran, which petitioners filed, the deductions for charitable             
          contributions and unreimbursed employee business expenses were              
          also inflated.  That return reflected an overpayment of $2,338,             
          which was also refunded to petitioners in due course.                       
               With respect to preparation of the 2000 return by Mr.                  
          Beltran, petitioner testified:                                              

                    The following year then I went back to him and he then            
               charged me $250 because he got me $2,500 back or whatever              
               those estimations were, and again, I certainly saw that                
               difference between my return and the return he prepared, and           
               I did ask him if that seemed rather excessive, and again, *            
               * * he was quite convincing, seemed to be quite credible in            
               his explanations and his referring to his tax books, et                
               cetera, explaining that "No, these numbers are very                    
               allowable."  Sort of a tax averaging kind of theory if you             
               will, and again, quite credible and quite convincing in his            
               explanation.                                                           

               Regarding the inflated amounts claimed on the returns,                 
          petitioner further testified:                                               

                    MR. THORNTON: The amount that we provided to him and              
               the amount that we could provide proof for was minimal                 
               compared to what he submitted for us, and then when I asked            
               him about that again, he was very convincing and seemed very           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011