- 10 - accompanying the recommendation to deny relief. Res judicata was not raised in the original answer filed in this case on August 13, 2001--more than 3 years after the effective date of section 6015. For the first time, in a Motion for Leave to File Amendment to Answer, filed April 9, 2002, respondent stated: Upon preparation for trial, respondent’s counsel discovered that the petitioner materially participated in a prior proceeding for the 1994 tax year before the U.S. Tax Court, whereby a Decision document was signed by petitioner on December 1, 1998, the respondent on December 16, 1998, and entered by the Court on December 17, 1998. McClellan was not available to testify at trial, and we do not know his rationale for declining to consider petitioner’s request for relief from joint liability. We assume, however, that he was aware that proposed legislation would give taxpayers an opportunity to raise that claim in a later action but, like petitioner, was unaware of the res judicata effect of closing a deficiency case under the circumstances then existing. Section 1.6015-1(e), Income Tax Regs., 67 Fed. Reg. 46286 (daily ed. July 18, 2002), effective with respect to requests for relief filed on or after July 18, 2002, provides: (e) Res judicata and collateral estoppel. A requesting spouse is barred from relief from joint and several liability under section 6015 by res judicata for any tax year for which a court of competent jurisdiction has rendered a final decision on the requesting spouse’s tax liability if relief under section 6015 was at issue in the prior proceeding, or if the requesting spouse meaningfully participated in that proceeding and could have raised relief under section 6015. A requesting spouse has not meaningfullyPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011