Lucy M. Wiggins - Page 3




                                        - 2 -                                         
          Revenue Code in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule                  
          references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.            
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s 1999                
          Federal income tax of $6,551.  The issues for decision are:  (1)            
          Whether petitioner is entitled to dependency exemption                      
          deductions; (2) whether petitioner is entitled to head-of-                  
          household filing status; (3) whether petitioner is entitled to a            
          deduction for charitable contributions; (4) whether petitioner is           
          entitled to deductions for unreimbursed employee expenses; and              
          (5) whether petitioner is entitled to a deduction for tax                   
          preparation fees.                                                           
               Petitioner resided in Temple Hills, Maryland, at the time              
          she filed the petition.  The stipulation of facts and the                   
          attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference.                
          Background                                                                  
               Petitioner claimed the following five individuals as                   
          dependents on Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for             
          1999:  Shirley Payne (Ms. Payne), a sister; Ushaka Darby                    
          (Ushaka), a nephew; James Coffield (Mr. Coffield), a nephew;                
          Donald Wiggins (Donald), a grandson; and Dontae Wiggins (Dontae),           
          a grandson.  Respondent disallowed all of petitioner’s claimed              
          dependency exemption deductions and correspondingly disallowed              
          petitioner’s claimed head-of-household filing status.  Because              
          the standard deduction amount was greater than the deductions               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011