- 14 - Ryan v. Commissioner, supra at 223, this Court imposed a $1,000 criminal fine for repeated contumacious failure to answer interrogatories. In this case, petitioner also ignored and attempted to avoid this Court’s order enforcing respondent’s discovery request by interposing the automatic stay. In this case, petitioner intentionally misrepresented and wrongfully interposed the automatic stay to frustrate and ignore the lawful orders, Rules, and process of this Court. The effect of petitioner’s conduct in this case is more serious and more deceitful than the taxpayer’s conduct in Ryan. We note that the $1,000 fine in Ryan was imposed more than 25 years ago. In order to impress petitioner with the seriousness of this matter and to fine him for his conduct in criminal contempt of this Court, we hold petitioner unconditionally liable for a fine of $5,000. To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order and decision will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Last modified: May 25, 2011