Oliver W. and Edna D. Wilson - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          “5-4 Ballroom/Supper Club” in October 1991.  He then attempted to           
          raise capital to reopen the 5-4 Ballroom by providing an                    
          “investment opportunity” for individuals in the “5-4                        
          Ballroom/Supper Club”.  During 1992, petitioner worked with a               
          mortgage banking company in an effort to raise about $1.5 million           
          from the local Black business community.  However, the effort was           
          unsuccessful, due to the large claim South Coast Thrift was then            
          asserting against petitioners and the 5401-9 S. Broadway                    
          property.                                                                   
               During 1991 and 1992, petitioner also offered annual                   
          memberships in the “5-4 Ballroom/Supper Club Inner Circle”.  A              
          membership would entitle a person to discounts when attending               
          performances in the planned ballroom/supper club and also to a              
          birthday celebration there.  Although a small amount of                     
          membership fees was collected during 1992, no income from                   
          membership fees was reported on petitioners’ 1992 income tax                
          return.5                                                                    
               Beginning in 1992, petitioner arranged for various                     
          charitable events to be held on the grounds of the 5401-9 S.                
          Broadway property.  He also arranged for an event to be held in             


               5Because the planned 5-4 Ballroom/Supper Club did not open,            
          the membership fees petitioner collected were probably refunded             
          or refundable, but the record does not disclose what happened to            
          these fees.  We note, however, that respondent did not determine            
          that the membership fees were income to petitioners in either               
          1992 or 1993.                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011