- 7 - Petitioner was awarded 48.85 percent of her former husband’s Navy retirement pay, and received $5,836 directly from the DFAS in 1998. Petitioner argues that she is not the legal owner of the military pension; therefore, the payments distributed to her are not includable in her gross income. The court of common pleas determined that the Navy pension was a marital asset available for equitable distribution incident to the divorce. The court of common pleas awarded her an “equitable distribution of 60 percent of the marital estate * * * as set forth in the plan”. Petitioner has a right to those distributions that were awarded to her. 10 U.S.C. sec. 1408(c)(2). Petitioner alleges that the military considers the military pension to be “pay” because it is taxed before a distribution (and the distribution is net of taxes).3 Petitioner has not presented any reason why the distributions to her, if they are “pay”, are not includable in her income. Petitioner argues that the military pension distributions she received are excludable from gross income by virtue of section 1041. An owner of an interest in a military retirement pension, like other pensions, has a right to receive future 3 Petitioner relies on 10 U.S.C. sec. 1408(a)(4) and Eatinger v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1990-310 for support for the argument that the military pension distribution is net of income taxes. Congress amended the statute in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991, Pub. L. 101-510, sec. 555(a)-(d), 104 Stat. 1569, 1570, and income tax withholding is no longer taken into account in determining disposable military retired pay under 10 U.S.C. sec. 1408(a)(4)(C).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011