Yu-Yang Wu - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          petitioner that the payments were on account of loans even though           
          he knew that the payments were on account of computer sales or              
          services.                                                                   
               Petitioner deposited or caused to be deposited in his                  
          personal bank account substantial amounts of money representing             
          revenues belonging to PAC’s business.  Petitioner deposited or              
          caused to be deposited into his personal bank account at least              
          $58,798.44 in 1988, $36,091.69 in 1989, and $50,837.89 in 1990 of           
          income belonging to PAC that was not reported on either PAC’s or            
          petitioner’s income tax returns.1                                           



               1As discussed infra pp. 16-21, respondent’s determinations             
          were based on an extremely conservative analysis.  During the 3             
          years before the Court, petitioner deposited $769,612 in his bank           
          account from sources who failed to respond to respondent’s                  
          requests for information.  Respondent treated the deposits from             
          these unexplained sources as not taxable to petitioner.  We                 
          believe that many of these deposits were taxable income that                
          petitioner diverted from PAC and failed to report.  Petitioner              
          had an additional $695,910 in unidentified deposits.  Respondent            
          also treated these unidentified deposits as nontaxable to                   
          petitioner.  Again, we believe that some portion of these                   
          unidentified deposits represented taxable income to petitioner.             
          Finally, approximately $80,000 of deposits in petitioner’s bank             
          account represented amounts that were reported by either                    
          petitioner or PAC.  Respondent took the position that any amounts           
          deposited into petitioner’s bank account that were reported as              
          income by PAC were not taxable to petitioner.  Because PAC was a            
          C corporation, amounts paid by PAC to petitioner would likely               
          constitute income to petitioner in the form of constructive                 
          dividends.  Nevertheless, respondent treated these amounts as               
          nontaxable to petitioner.  Respondent identified as taxable to              
          petitioner only amounts that respondent could verify were                   
          revenues of PAC that had not been reported on either PAC’s or               
          petitioner’s Federal income tax returns.                                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011