Yu-Yang Wu - Page 23




                                       - 23 -                                         
          otherwise prevent the collection of taxes.  See Parks v.                    
          Commissioner, 94 T.C. at 661.                                               
               The presence of fraud is a question of fact to be resolved             
          upon consideration of the entire record.  See Recklitis v.                  
          Commissioner, 91 T.C. 874, 909 (1988).  Because direct proof of             
          the taxpayer's intent is rarely available, fraud may be proven by           
          circumstantial evidence.  See Spies v. United States, 317 U.S.              
          492 (1943); Recklitis v. Commissioner, supra at 910.                        
               A taxpayer convicted of criminal tax evasion is collaterally           
          estopped from denying liability for the civil fraud penalty.                
          Moore v. United States, 360 F.2d 353 (4th Cir. 1965); Zamzam v.             
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-371.  Therefore, petitioner, having           
          been convicted of criminal tax evasion for 1988, is liable as a             
          matter of law for the fraud addition for 1988.  Respondent must             
          prove fraud by clear and convincing evidence for 1989 and 1990.             
               Courts have developed a nonexclusive list of items of                  
          circumstantial evidence--often referred to as “badges of                    
          fraud”--that will support a finding of fraudulent intent.  In               
          Bradford v. Commissioner, 796 F.2d 303, 307 (9th Cir. 1986),                
          affg. T.C. Memo. 1984-601, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth               
          Circuit--to which an appeal of this case would lie--set forth the           
          following indicia or “badges” of fraud:  (1) Understatement of              
          income; (2) maintenance of inadequate records; (3) failure to               
          file tax returns; (4) implausible or inconsistent explanations of           






Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011