Acme Steel Company (formerly known as Interlake, Inc., and now known as Acme Metals, Inc.) and Consolidated Subsidiaries - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
          net operating loss carryback from 1983 to 1980, a consolidated              
          investment credit carryover from 1979 to 1980, and consolidated             
          investment, jobs, qualified research, and energy credit                     
          carrybacks from 1983 to 1980.  For 1981, respondent determined a            
          deficiency resulting from the disallowance of consolidated net              
          operating loss carrybacks from 1982, consolidated qualified                 
          research credit carrybacks from 1984, consolidated investment               
          credit carrybacks from 1982 and 1983, and consolidated general              
          business credit carrybacks from 1984.  Respondent made several              
          determinations for 1983, including disallowing a claimed section            
          162 expense, ordinary losses realized on the liquidation and                
          dissolution of Erie Mining Company, a subsidiary, disallowing a             
          consolidated net operating loss carryback from Interlake’s 1986             
          tax year, and disallowing other carrybacks and carryovers.  With            
          respect to 1984, respondent disallowed a trade or business                  
          expense, charitable contributions, the net operating loss carried           
          back from 1986, and disallowed other credits and carrybacks.                
               On May 16, 1994, petitioner filed a petition in which it               
          disputed all of respondent’s determinations.  Paragraph 5v of the           
          petition alleges that respondent “erroneously determined that               
          * * * [petitioner] is the common parent of the affiliated group”.           
          Additionally, the petition alleges that the notice of deficiency            
          issued to petitioner was not issued to the appropriate                      








Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011