Acme Steel Company (formerly known as Interlake, Inc., and now known as Acme Metals, Inc.) and Consolidated Subsidiaries - Page 63

                                       - 63 -                                         
          refund action under section 7405.  The Court of Appeals agreed              
          with cases holding that the payment of tax extinguishes the                 
          assessment and that the assessment is not somehow revived when              
          the Commissioner mistakenly issues a refund.  In Clayton v.                 
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-327, the Court observed that                  
          whether the refund is a rebate or nonrebate refund depends on               
          what it represents:  If the refund reflects a recalculation of              
          the taxpayers’ tax liability, it is a rebate refund; if the                 
          refund is unrelated to a recalculation of tax liability, it is a            
          nonrebate refund.                                                           
               In the case at hand, the tentative refunds were not issued             
          by accident, see O’Bryant v. United States, supra at 342, or                
          because of an error unrelated to the recalculation of tax                   
          liability, see Clayton v. Commissioner, supra.  The tentative               
          refunds were issued on the basis of petitioner’s recalculation of           
          the tax owed by the group for 1981 and 1984.  In 1987, petitioner           
          decided that it had sustained a $29,286,968 CNOL, which could be            
          carried back to, and deducted from, the affiliated group’s 1984             
          tax year income, which in turn freed credits claimed in 1984 to             
          be carried back to 1981.  See sec. 172; sec. 1.1502-21, Income              
          Tax Regs.  To give effect to its calculations, petitioner applied           
          for and received a tentative carryback and refund adjustment                
          pursuant to section 6411.  Thus, when petitioner filed the                  
          application for tentative carryback adjustment, it substantively            






Page:  Previous  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011