- 16 - Business has failed to provide the Court with the documentary evidence necessary to support its contention that Mr. Adorno is its duly appointed trustee. As previously discussed, Adorno Business is purportedly an irrevocable trust wherein The Adorno Asset Management Trust (Adorno Asset) is the “Creator”/”Investor” and Mr. Adorno is the “Acceptor”.16 According to the purported trust instrument, Mr. Adorno was specifically designated “director” of Adorno Business. However, no provision of the purported trust instrument appoints or designates Mr. Adorno “trustee” for Adorno Business. We find it difficult to accept that the title “director” confers the legal status of trustee on Mr. Adorno. The purported trust instrument does not define the term “director”, but it dictates that the director comprises the “Board of Directors” to “exercise collectively the exclusive management and control of The Adorno Business Company property and business affairs”. Further, the purported trust instrument does not provide the director with the authority to institute legal proceedings on behalf of Adorno Business.17 The specific duties, powers, and responsibilities 16 We have serious doubts that the trust was validly formed because Mr. Adorno lacked the requisite capacity to execute the purported trust instrument on behalf of Adorno Asset. See The Adorno Asset Mgmt. Trust v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-127. However, we assume arguendo that the purported trust instrument is valid. 17 See 760 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/4.11 (West 1992).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011