Thomas James Allen - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioner’s Federal             
          income taxes for the years 1998 and 1999 in the amounts of $2,409           
          and $3,617, respectively.  All issues regarding the year 1999               
          raised in the statutory notice of deficiency mailed to petitioner           
          on September 5, 2001, have been conceded by petitioner, and we              
          need address only the issues pertaining to the year 1998.                   
               For the year 1998, we are asked to decide:  (1) Whether                
          petitioner is entitled to claimed job expenses and other                    
          miscellaneous itemized deductions in excess of the $1,105 amount            
          allowed by respondent, and (2) whether petitioner is entitled to            
          Schedule C business expense deductions in the amount of $12,747             
          as claimed on his return, or in the amount of $2,459, as allowed            
          by respondent in the notice of deficiency.                                  
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulations of fact and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by this reference.  Petitioner resided in               
          Charlotte, North Carolina, on the date the petition was filed in            
          this case.                                                                  
               On Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, of his 1998 return,                
          petitioner claimed job expenses and other miscellaneous                     
          deductions in the amount of $5,915, subject to the 2-percent                
          floor on miscellaneous itemized deductions in the amount of $510.           
          Upon auditing petitioner’s return, respondent disallowed the                
          amount claimed.  Respondent also determined, however, that                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011