Kathryn Bernal - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
          Notice 98-61, 1998-2 C.B. 756; Rev. Proc. 2000-15, 2000-1 C.B.              
          447; secs. 1.66-1 through 1.66-5, Proposed Income Tax Regs., 67             
          Fed. Reg. 2841 (Jan. 22, 2002).  Rev. Proc. 2000-15, supra, also            
          provides that the taxpayer seeking equitable relief under section           
          66(c) must file Form 8857 or other similar statement signed under           
          penalties of perjury within 2 years of the first collection                 
          activity against the requesting spouse.  Under section 1.66-                
          4(g)(1), Proposed Income Tax Regs., supra, the requesting spouse            
          must file Form 8857 or other written request, signed under                  
          penalties of perjury, indicating why such relief is appropriate             
          within the time period prescribed in paragraph (g)(2) of section            
          1.66-4, Proposed Income Tax Regs., supra.                                   
               The Tax Court is a court of limited jurisdiction, and we may           
          exercise our jurisdiction only to the extent authorized by                  
          Congress.  Sec. 7442; Judge v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 1175, 1180-            
          1181 (1987); Naftel v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 527, 529 (1985).               
               In a deficiency proceeding we may review a taxpayer’s                  
          request for relief under section 66(c).  In such circumstance, we           
          must decide whether the Commissioner abused his discretion.  See            
          Hardy v. Commissioner, supra; Morris v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.            
          2002-17; Beck v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-198.  The Court              



               6(...continued)                                                        
          relief from joint and several liability on joint returns are                
          inapplicable.  See Raymond v. Commissioner, 119 T.C. 191, 195-196           
          (2002).                                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011