Michael W. Bethea - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          Section 6320 and/or 6330.1  The issues for decision are:                    
          (1) Whether respondent may proceed with collection action as so             
          determined, and (2) whether the Court should impose a penalty               
          under section 6673.                                                         
                                     Background                                       
               Petitioner filed a Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax               
          Return, for the 1997 taxable year.  On the return, petitioner               
          reported $9,254 of wage income, as reflected in an attached Form            
          W-2, Wage and Tax Statement.  He then entered “0” on all other              
          lines of the return with the exception of showing $902.11 in                
          Federal income tax withheld, $18,850 in 1997 estimated tax                  
          payments, and a corresponding $19,752.11 as the total payments,             
          amount overpaid, and amount to be refunded to him.  Petitioner              
          also enclosed with the 1997 return a typed statement challenging            
          his duty to file returns and to pay tax.                                    
               Respondent computed petitioner’s tax liability on the basis            
          of the Form W-2 income and assessed the resultant $476.2                    

               1 Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the            
          Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and Rule references are to the           
          Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.                                  
               2 Given that petitioner’s return reported his wages and                
          attached the supporting Form W-2 but showed zero in tax,                    
          respondent apparently calculated and assessed the tax pursuant to           
          sec. 6213(b)(1) as arising from a mathematical or clerical error.           
          The record does not reflect that petitioner ever requested an               
          abatement of this assessment, see sec. 6213(b)(2), or otherwise             
          disputed the assessment either before the Office of Appeals or in           
          the instant judicial proceeding.  Accordingly, the propriety of             
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011