Florence C. Blankson - Page 12




                                       - 11 -                                         

               Section 162 allows a deduction for ordinary and necessary              
          expenses that are paid or incurred during the taxable year in               
          carrying on a trade of business.  Sec. 162(a); Deputy v. Dupont,            
          308 U.S. 488, 495 (1940).  A trade or business includes the trade           
          or business of being an employee.  O’Malley v. Commissioner, 91             
          T.C. 352, 363-364 (1988).                                                   
               As noted earlier, petitioner was engaged during the years at           
          issue both as an employee and as a self-employed person.  Some of           
          the deductions claimed on her returns related to employee                   
          business expenses (Schedule A), and others related to her self-             
          employment activity (Schedule C).  Respondent reallocated some of           
          the expenses between petitioner’s two activities, a determination           
          that petitioner does not challenge.  Other expenses were                    
          disallowed for lack of substantiation, which petitioner does                
          challenge.  With respect to those expenses, the Court notes that            
          petitioner did not maintain books and records to chronicle her              
          income and expenses, nor did she maintain logs on the uses of her           
          vehicles in her activities.  She presented at trial receipts and            
          copies of checks purportedly to substantiate expenses she                   
          incurred.  However, those receipts do not establish to the                  
          Court’s satisfaction a substantiation of expenses incurred in any           
          amounts greater than the amounts allowed by respondent in the               
          notices of deficiency, with one exception discussed below.  Some            
          of the evidence presented appeared to be for personal expenses,             





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011