Peter U. and Mary M. Boehme - Page 11




                                       - 11 -                                         
          on the basis of timeliness.  Therefore, we shall consider                   
          petitioners’ argument on the merits.                                        
               On the basis of the record before us, we decline to hold               
          that any portion of the $64,000 interest payment is deductible              
          pursuant to section 163(h)(2)(A).  In order to fall within that             
          provision, an interest payment must qualify as “[i]nterest                  
          expense allocated to a trade or business expenditure”.  Sec.                
          1.163-8T(a)(4)(i)(A), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 52 Fed. Reg.              
          24999 (July 2, 1987).  A “trade or business expenditure” is one             
          that has been incurred “in connection with the conduct of * * *             
          [a] trade or business”.  Sec. 1.163-8T(b)(7), Temporary Income              
          Tax Regs., 52 Fed. Reg. 24999 (July 2, 1987).  There is nothing             
          in the record to indicate that any portion of the loans was used            
          to modify or improve that portion of petitioners’ residence                 
          devoted to the conduct of Mary’s business.  In fact, the Forms              
          8829 attached to the returns for the audit years indicate that              
          none of the proceeds of the loans was used for such purpose.6               
          Therefore, we find that no portion of the $64,000 interest                  



               6  The Form 8829 for 1995 states that, out of a total area             
          of 3,240 square feet, 1,230 square feet were used “regularly and            
          exclusively” for business.  According to the Form 8829 filed for            
          1996, the comparable figures are 4,090 square feet (total area)             
          and 630 square feet (business use area).  Thus, while total area            
          increased between 1995 and 1996, presumably as a result of the              
          improvement paid for by a portion of the proceeds of the loans,             
          the amount devoted to business use decreased by almost 50 percent           
          during that same period.                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011