David J. Boyd - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         

          expenses is required.  Sec. 274(d); sec. 1.274-5T(a)(l),                    
          Temporary Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46014 (Nov. 6, 1985).              
          To meet the adequate records requirements of section 274(d), a              
          taxpayer "shall maintain an account book, diary, log, statement             
          of expense, trip sheets, or similar record * * * and documentary            
          evidence * * * which, in combination, are sufficient to establish           
          each element of an expenditure".  Sec. 1.274-5T(c)(2)(i),                   
          Temporary Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46017 (Nov. 6, 1985).              
          The elements to be proven with respect to each traveling expense            
          are the amount, time, place, and business purpose of the travel.            
          Sec. 1.274-5T(b)(2), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg.               
          46014 (Nov. 6, 1985).  These substantiation requirements are                
          designed to encourage taxpayers to maintain records, together               
          with documentary evidence substantiating each element of the                
          expense sought to be deducted.  Sec. l.274-5T(c)(l), Temporary              
          Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46016 (Nov. 6, 1985).                        
               Petitioner offered little or no evidence at trial with                 
          respect to his parking, car and truck, travel, meals, and                   
          entertainment expenses that would satisfy the requirements of               
          section 274(d) and the regulations cited.  Similarly, no evidence           
          of petitioner’s membership expenses was submitted.  While                   
          petitioner claimed to have offered more evidence to respondent’s            
          agent during the audit, that evidence was conspicuously lacking             
          at trial, particularly considering petitioner’s profession as a             
          litigator.  To the extent petitioner used his vehicle to commute            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011