Taylor Brinson - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
          “really couldn’t say a certain amount.”  Petitioner also produced           
          no records and does not know the amount of support that he                  
          provided for the children.                                                  
               In preparing his 2000 Federal income tax return, petitioner            
          claimed, with respect to the children, two dependency exemption             
          deductions and an EIC based on the children’s being his foster              
          children, and used head of household filing status.  Respondent             
          disallowed the dependency exemption deductions and the EIC.                 
          Respondent also determined that petitioner’s proper filing status           
          was single.                                                                 
          Dependency Exemption Deductions                                             
               Petitioner argues that he is entitled to claim dependency              
          exemption deductions with respect to the children.  Generally,              
          sections 151 and 152 provide that a taxpayer is entitled to                 
          deduct an exemption for a minor dependent if the taxpayer                   
          provides more than half of the support for the minor dependent.             
          A son or daughter of a taxpayer’s sister is included in the                 
          definition of a dependent.  Sec. 152(a)(6).  The sole issue with            
          regard to the dependency exemption deductions claimed by                    
          petitioner is whether petitioner has established that he provided           
          more than half of the support for the children.2                            



          2  Sec. 7491 dealing with the burden of proof has no application            
          to this case because petitioner has not satisfied the                       
          requirements of sec. 7491(a).                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011