Laura L. Brooks - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          driving for TDI for 6 or 7 months in 1997, at the time their 1997           
          joint Federal income tax return (the joint return) was filed,               
          petitioner knew only that he worked at least 3 months for TDI               
          during that year.                                                           
               In 1997, petitioner and Mr. Tice began experiencing serious            
          marital difficulties.  On January 26, 1998, petitioner prepared             
          the joint return and attached Forms W-2, Wage and Tax Statement,            
          from Prestige and Kelly.  When petitioner asked Mr. Tice for a              
          Form W-2 from TDI, Mr. Tice told her that he would “take care of            
          it”.                                                                        
               A Form 1099 was not sent to petitioner’s residence, and the            
          joint return did not include compensation TDI paid to Mr. Tice.             
          In 1999, respondent notified petitioner of proposed changes to              
          the joint return relating to Mr. Tice’s compensation from TDI               
          (i.e., $9,133) and a resulting disallowance of the claimed earned           
          income tax credit (i.e., $961).  Petitioner subsequently filed a            
          Form 8857, Request for Innocent Spouse Relief, in which she                 
          contended that, at the time the return was filed, she was not               
          aware that Mr. Tice had self-employment income from TDI.                    
               By letter dated February 8, 2000, respondent notified Mr.              
          Tice of petitioner’s contention that she should be relieved from            
          joint and several liability pursuant to section 6015 (section               
          6015 relief).  In his response dated February 15, 2000, Mr. Tice            
          contended that petitioner was not entitled to section 6015                  
          relief.                                                                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011