Bruce L. Brosi - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          pursuant to section 6511(h).  Application of section 6511(h) is             
          an issue of first impression.                                               
                                     Background                                       
               During 1996, petitioner was employed as an airline pilot for           
          USAir, Inc.  On or about February 26, 2001, respondent issued a             
          notice of deficiency to petitioner for the taxable year ended               
          December 31, 1996.  At the time respondent issued the notice of             
          deficiency, petitioner had not filed an income tax return for               
          that year.  On May 22, 2001, petitioner mailed his petition to              
          the Court seeking redetermination of those amounts determined by            
          respondent for 1996.  On July 18, 2002, petitioner filed his 1996           
          Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, with respondent’s             
          Appeals Office.  On line 22 of his 1996 return, petitioner listed           
          his gross income as $100,523.  Petitioner’s income tax liability            
          for 1996 was $21,790.  During the 1996 taxable year, petitioner             
          had Federal income tax withholdings totaling $30,050.                       
          Petitioner’s income tax withholdings for 1996 exceeded his tax              
          liability by $8,260.                                                        
               At the time he filed his petition, petitioner resided in               
          Moon Township, Pennsylvania.                                                
                                     Discussion                                       
               In his motion for summary judgment, respondent contends that           
          there are no genuine issues of material fact and that he is                 
          entitled to judgment as a matter of law.  According to                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011