- 4 - can have penalties imposed per IRC � 6673(a)(1).” Respondent included a Form 4340, Certificate of Assessments, Payments, and Other Specified Matters, for 1998 with this letter. On March 8, 2002, Mr. Jewett sent to the Internal Revenue Service Appeals Office a letter incorporating and adding to petitioner’s frivolous arguments contained in the hearing request. Mr. Jewett’s letter consisted of 37 pages of tax- protester boilerplate, including: 1. The individual or individuals named above are not “persons or a person liable for the income tax or required to file a Form 1040, by virtue of non-residence in, or lack of income earned within, or effectively connected to, any U.S. territory, Possession and/or enclave deriving authority from Article I, Sec. 2 C1.17 or Article 4, Sec., 3, C1.2 of the Constitution of the United States. The individuals named herein are natural born Citizens of one of the 50 Republic states, under the Constitution and Law. A hearing pursuant to petitioner’s hearing request was conducted on March 28, 2002, with a court reporter, petitioner, Mr. Jewett, and Settlement Officer Mark Kennedy and Appeals Office Team Manager Ronald Albert for the Internal Revenue Service, present. A transcript of the proceedings was made. Mr. Jewett repeated his frivolous arguments. For example, Mr. Jewett argued: MR. JEWETT: Now, one of the items that I mentioned in my letter to you was that the - - this document, which the I.R.S. says is a notice of deficiency, was not signed by the Secretary. * * * So, therefore, unless the Internal Revenue Service can produce to you a delegation order indicating that this individual had authority to sign this notice of deficiency on behalf of the Secretary, for that reason alone, sir, you must make a determination that thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011