Linda Bunce - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s 1998                
          Federal income tax in the amount of $3,810.  This Court must                
          decide:  (1) Whether $10,891 received by petitioner as a portion            
          of her former spouse’s military retirement pay is includable in             
          her gross income in 1998, and (2) whether petitioner is entitled            
          to claim business expenses in an amount greater than the amount             
          allowed by respondent.                                                      
               Some of the facts in this case have been stipulated and are            
          so found.  Petitioner resided in Chula Vista, California, at the            
          time she filed her petition.                                                
               Petitioner and her former husband, Ronald L. Bunce (Mr.                
          Bunce), were divorced on February 7, 1986.  Under the Decree of             
          Divorce, the Superior Court of California awarded petitioner 45.5           
          percent of Mr. Bunce’s gross military retirement pay as a                   
          property settlement.                                                        
               In 1998, petitioner received total payments of $10,891 from            
          the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS).  Petitioner              
          did not report this amount on her 1998 individual income tax                
          return.                                                                     
               Under section 61(a), gross income includes all income from             
          whatever source derived, including pensions.  Sec. 61(a)(11).               
          Military retirement pay is a pension.  Eatinger v. Commissioner,            
          T.C. Memo. 1990-310.  If a spouse of a service member has a                 
          vested interest in the community income, then the spouse must pay           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011