Shirley Renee Burton - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
               sustained.  The levy action is necessary in the inter-                 
               est of effective tax administration because the tax-                   
               payer has not fully cooperated with the Service Center                 
               or Appeals and has not filed tax returns for the years                 
               1997 thru 2001.  [Reproduced literally.]                               
                                     Discussion                                       
               The Court may grant summary judgment where there is no                 
          genuine issue of material fact and a decision may be rendered as            
          a matter of law.  Rule 121(b); Sundstrand Corp. v. Commissioner,            
          98 T.C. 518, 520 (1992), affd. 17 F.3d 965 (7th Cir. 1994).  We             
          conclude that there are no genuine issues of material fact                  
          regarding the questions raised in respondent’s motion.                      
               Where, as is the case here, the validity of the underlying             
          tax liability is not properly placed at issue, the Court will               
          review the determination of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue            
          for abuse of discretion.  Sego v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604, 610           
          (2000); Goza v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 176, 181-182 (2000).                 
               In her petition, petitioner alleges:                                   
                    I should not owe any taxes nor penalties & inter-                 
               est for neither of these three tax years.  I do not                    
               know why I owe for 1988.  I participated in an audit                   
               face-to-face for 1989 and gave all documents requested                 
               to prove any claimed deductions.  The IRS audit person                 
               concluded after about 1� year [sic] and had not fin-                   
               ished (to my memory). * * * The paperwork I saw disal-                 
               lowed many legitimate deductions and I don’t understand                
               that.                                                                  
               Based upon our examination of the entire record before us,             
          we find that respondent did not abuse respondent’s discretion in            
          determining to proceed with the collection actions as determined            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011