Martin Edward Caulfield - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         

               After concessions by petitioner, the issue for decision is             
          whether, under section 408, distributions to petitioner from two            
          qualified pension plans with his former employer are includable             
          in gross income in an amount in excess of the amount reported on            
          petitioner's 2000 Federal income tax return.2                               
               Some of the facts were stipulated.  Those facts and the                
          accompanying exhibits are so found and are incorporated herein by           
          reference.  Petitioner’s legal residence at the time the petition           
          was filed was Glenwood, Arkansas.                                           
               Petitioner was an electronic computer technician and retired           
          from Sunoco Oil Co. (Sunoco) during 1993, after working 12 years            
          with that employer.  As an employee of Sunoco, petitioner was the           
          beneficiary of two retirement plans, which were qualified under             
          section 401(k).  During the year 2000 petitioner received a                 
          distribution from one plan in the amount of $12,500 and a                   
          distribution from the other plan in the amount of $14,000, or a             
          total of $26,500.  Sunoco issued to petitioner two Forms 1099-R,            
          Distributions From Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-               
          Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc., which state that            
          the taxable portion of the $12,500 distribution was $12,389.64,             


               2    In the stipulation, the parties agreed that                       
          petitioner's Social Security benefits during 2000 totaled $15,616           
          instead of $15,950, as reported on petitioner's income tax                  
          return.  Petitioner conceded his failure to report interest                 
          income of $28 and dividend income of $150.                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011