Michael Chin and Julie Hedrich Chin - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         
          under section 162.  Section 162(a) allows a deduction for “all              
          the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the             
          taxable year in carrying on any trade or business”.  Section                
          162(a)(3) specifically includes “rentals or other payments                  
          required to be made as a condition to the continued use or                  
          possession, for purposes of the trade or business, of property to           
          which the taxpayer has not taken or is not taking title or in               
          which he has no equity” as deductions that qualify as ordinary              
          and necessary.                                                              
               The question as to whether an expenditure satisfies the                
          requirements of section 162 is one of fact.  Commissioner v.                
          Heininger, 320 U.S. 467 (1943).  In addition, “intrafamily                  
          transactions resulting in the distribution of income within a               
          family unit are subject to the closest scrutiny.”  Van Zandt v.             
          Commissioner 40 T.C. 824, 830 (1963) (citing Commissioner v.                
          Tower, 327 U.S. 280 (1946); Helvering v. Clifford, 309 U.S. 331             
          (1940)), affd. 341 F.2d 440 (5th Cir. 1965).                                
               Petitioner maintains that the Sherman Oaks Property rent               
          payments were made as part of an oral agreement between him and             
          his brother when incorporating the Skin Service Club in 1991.  In           
          return for the contribution of day-to-day management services to            
          the corporation by petitioner’s brother, petitioner would be                
          solely obligated to make rent payments on the Sherman Oaks                  
          Property lease.  Petitioner further maintains that the agreement            







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011