- 6 - incarceration and began residing with his mother and aunt, Shirley Johnson and her child moved in with them. Petitioner acknowledged that Shirley Johnson held part-time jobs during that period, although no evidence was presented as to the amount of her earnings or other sources of support she may have had, nor was any evidence presented to show what amounts petitioner provided to his daughter for her support. The home was not owned by petitioner, although he claimed at trial that he paid the utilities and the groceries for all the occupants of the home. Petitioner, however, maintained no records to document the amounts that were expended by him and, in particular, the amounts spent for his daughter. His mother and aunt were both receiving retirement benefits and presumably shared in some of these expenses. On this record, the Court concludes that petitioner failed to establish that he provided more than half of La Toya Johnson's support during 2000. Respondent is sustained on this issue. The second issue is whether petitioner is entitled to head- of-household filing status for the year at issue. Section 2(b) provides generally that an individual shall be considered a head- of-household if, among other requisites not pertinent here, such individual maintains as his home a household that constitutes for more than one-half of such taxable year the principal place ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011