- 5 - Stock Ownership Plan in Docket No. 18155-96 “R” (whether litigated or settled), with respect to the following taxpayer: Name of Case: Howard E. Clendenen, Inc. v. Commissioner Tax Court Docket No.: 18155-96 “R” (hereinafter the CONTROLLING CASE). 3. The petitioner in this case is the same as the taxpayer in the CONTROLLING CASE. Mr. Clendenen’s stipulation to be bound provided that the only remaining issues in dispute involve the issues asserted in paragraph 4(a) of the petition that relate to the plan’s qualification. Further, Mr. Clendenen’s stipulation to be bound provided in part: 2. The adjustments in respondent’s notice of deficiency relating to the issues or items asserted in paragraph 4(a) of the petition, as specified in the preamble, shall be determined by the resolution of the qualified status of the Howard E. Clendenen, Inc., Employee Stock Ownership Plan in Docket No. 18155-96 “R” (whether litigated or settled), with respect to the following taxpayer: Name of Case: Howard E. Clendenen, Inc. v. Commissioner Tax Court Docket No.: 18155-96 “R” (hereinafter the CONTROLLING CASE). 3. All issues involving the above adjustments shall be resolved as if the petitioner in this case were the same as the taxpayer in the CONTROLLING CASE. Both stipulations to be bound also provided: 4. A decision shall be submitted in this case when the decision in the CONTROLLING CASE (whether litigated or settled) becomes final under I.R.C. � 7481. 5. Upon entry of the decision in the CONTROLLING CASE, petitioner consents to the assessment and collection of the deficiencies attributable to the adjustments formulated by reference to the Tax Court’s opinion, notwithstanding the restrictions under I.R.C. � 6213(a). The parties agree to this STIPULATION TO BE BOUND.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011