Tracee Creen - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          increased deficiency alleged in respondent’s amendment to answer            
          on which respondent has the burden of proof.                                
               On October 7, 2002, this case was recalled for trial on the            
          increased deficiency alleged in respondent’s amendment to answer.           
          Neither petitioner nor any authorized representative of peti-               
          tioner appeared.  Respondent appeared, and the Court held a trial           
          on the increased deficiency alleged by respondent.6                         
               On October 9, 2002, this case was recalled for a hearing on            
          respondent’s motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution.  Neither            
          petitioner nor any authorized representative of petitioner                  
          appeared.  Counsel for respondent appeared and informed the Court           
          that on October 7, 2002, she had sent to petitioner by U.S.                 
          Postal Service Express Mail and by facsimile a copy of respon-              
          dent’s motion together with a transmittal letter informing                  
          petitioner of the hearing on respondent’s motion to dismiss for             
          lack of prosecution that the Court scheduled on October 9, 2002,            
          and of the consequences of her failure to appear at that hearing.           
               On October 10, 2002, the Court received a document from                
          petitioner that the Court had filed as petitioner’s motion to               
          dismiss (petitioner’s October 10, 2002 motion to dismiss).                  
               In an Order dated October 16, 2002 (October 16, 2002 Order),           
          the Court denied petitioner’s October 10, 2002 motion to dismiss.           


               6The Court ordered the parties to file posttrial briefs.               
          Petitioner failed to file a brief in this case.                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011