-18- that an expenditure be capitalized when it (1) creates a separate and distinct asset, (2) produces a significant future benefit, or (3) is incurred “in connection with” the acquisition of a capital asset. See also Commissioner v. Idaho Power Co., 418 U.S. 1, 13 (1974); Woodward v. Commissioner, 397 U.S. 572, 575- 576 (1970). If any of the three conditions is met, an expense may not be deducted and must be capitalized. Here, the correct legal framework in determining whether the disputed legal fees are deductible is the origin of the claim test. United States v. Gilmore, 372 U.S. 39 (1963). In order for these fees to be deductible, the origin of the claim in the underlying action must be proximately related to petitioner’s trade or business. Kornhauser v. United States, 276 U.S. 145 (1928). The origin of the claim test is factual, and the factors to be considered include: (1) Allegations in the complaint, (2) the legal issues involved, (3) the nature and objectives of the litigation, (4) the defenses asserted, (5) the purposes for which the amounts claimed as deductible were expended, and (6) the background of litigation and all facts pertaining to the controversy. Boagni v. Commissioner, 59 T.C. 708, 713 (1973). The first disputed fee, $770, relates to Oakland 3. The complaint by Pomeroy in this case alleged that petitioner, in his capacity as president of H.K. Peach, had seized control of the corporation and had operated the corporation “as his privatePage: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011