David D. Le, a.k.a. David Dung Le, a.k.a. Dung V. Le and Kim Huong Le, a.k.a. Kim Le, et al. - Page 4

                                         -4-                                          
          Les’ Deficiencies                                                           
          Years     Deficiencies   Penalties                                          
          1990        $89,826       $67,370                                           
          1991         59,246        44,435                                           
          DDL’s Unpaid Liabilities                                                    
          Years     Income taxes   Penalties                                          
          1990        $98,540       $73,905                                           
          1991         65,897        49,423                                           
               We decide as to the subject years:                                     
               1.  Whether petitioner operated his medical practice through           
          a C corporation known as DDL.  We hold he did.                              
               2.  Whether the Les’ gross income includes constructive                
          distributions in the amounts determined by respondent.  We hold             
          it does.                                                                    
               3.  Whether the Les, in their individual capacities, are               
          liable for the fraud penalties determined by respondent under               
          section 6663(a).  We hold they are.                                         
               4.  Whether the Les, as transferees of DDL’s assets, are               
          liable for DDL’s unpaid Federal corporate income taxes (inclusive           
          of penalties).  We hold they are.                                           
               5.  Whether the period of limitations under section 6501 has           
          run as to the Les’ personal income taxes.  We hold it has not.4             
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    

               4 On the basis of our holdings, we also sustain without                
          further comment certain computational adjustments made by                   
          respondent and disputed by petitioners.                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011