- 6 - debenture notes was equal among the debenture holders, and none of the debenture holders received a management position or an increase in management responsibilities with petitioner as a result of the debenture funds petitioner received. The debenture notes were unsecured and subordinated to claims of petitioner’s secured creditors, and, if not paid, the debenture holders could enforce payment on the debenture notes only if the holders of more than 50 percent of the value of all the outstanding debenture notes joined in a proceeding against petitioner to enforce payment. From August of 1993 through the time of trial in 2002, petitioner made all scheduled payments of principal and designated interest due on the debenture notes. When petitioner began operations in August of 1993, the above initial sources of funding (treating the debenture funds as debt of petitioner and not as equity) resulted in a debt-to- equity ratio for petitioner of approximately 26:1. In just over 3 years, petitioner’s debt-to-equity ratio (treating the debenture funds as debt of petitioner and not as equity) was reduced to approximately 4:1. The rapid decrease in petitioner’s debt-to-equity ratio from 1993 to 1996 reflected petitioner’s success in generating operating revenue. Comparative 1993-1996 yearend financial information for petitioner (treating the debenture funds as debt of petitioner and not as equity) is set forth below:Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011