S.W. DePasture - Page 11





                                       - 10 -                                         
               The parties now agree that the adjusted basis in the Mystic            
          Lake property as of the date of the distribution was $129,499.              
          Consequently, we turn our attention to the fair market value of             
          that property as of the date it was distributed.                            
               Each party employed a valuation expert to determine the fair           
          market value of the Mystic Lake property as of March 2, 1995.               
          Both experts appraised the land separately from the improvements,           
          and each expert relied, at least in part, on comparable sales in            
          formulating his opinion of the property’s fair market value.                
               According to petitioner’s expert, James Searcy, the fair               
          market value of the Mystic Lake property as of the date of the              
          distribution ranged from $104,444 (income approach) to $135,780             
          (cost minus depreciation approach, allocating $77,000 to land and           
          $58,780 to improvements).  Mr. Searcy determined that the “final            
          reconciliation of value” was $125,000, which also represented his           
          estimate of the property’s fair market value using the market               
          approach to valuation.  In arriving at his cost estimate of                 
          value, Mr. Searcy used the cost minus depreciation approach.  He            
          estimated the replacement cost of the three small structures to             
          be $137,700, but reduced this amount by 60 percent to $55,080 to            
          account for depreciation.  Mr. Searcy considered the largest of             
          the four structures located on the property to be functionally              
          obsolete on the date of the distribution and assigned no value to           
          that structure.  Applying the allocation between land and                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011