- 8 - and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing, sent to petitioner with respect to his tax liabilities. Finally, respondent has moved for a penalty under section 6673 on the ground that petitioner’s arguments are frivolous and that he instituted and maintained this proceeding merely for delay. Section 6673 provides that this Court may impose a penalty, not to exceed $25,000, where it is found that a taxpayer’s position in the proceeding is frivolous and/or that the proceeding was instituted and maintained primarily for delay. Section 6673 penalties may be imposed in a lien and levy case. Pierson v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 576, 580-581 (2000). In addition to questioning the authenticity of respondent’s documentation, petitioner has interposed protester arguments which have, on numerous occasions, been rejected by the courts. In order to support his arguments, petitioner has selectively picked phrases out of context from statutes and rulings. In so doing, petitioner chose to ignore more current or complete statements of the law. In that same vein, petitioner has chosen to ignore and/or not follow case precedent and interpretation of the statutory law. In that regard, petitioner has insinuated that he is subject only to legal precedent of the Supreme Court and that legal precedent of lower courts (such as the United States Tax Court) is binding only with respect to the particular taxpayer who was the subject of a specific case.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011