- 5 - OPINION Section 162(a)(1) allows as a deduction “a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services actually rendered”. Section 1.162-7(a), Income Tax Regs., provides a two-part test for deductibility of compensation: (1) Whether the payment was purely for services rendered and (2) whether the amount paid was reasonable. See Estate of Wallace v. Commissioner, 95 T.C. 525, 552 (1990), affd. 965 F.2d 1038 (11th Cir. 1992). Section 1.162-9, Income Tax Regs., provides that bonuses paid to employees are deductible “when such payments are made in good faith and as additional compensation for the services actually rendered by the employees, provided such payments, when added to the stipulated salaries, do not exceed a reasonable compensation for the services rendered.” Whether an expense that is claimed pursuant to section 162(a)(1) is reasonable compensation for services rendered is a question of fact that must be decided on the basis of the particular facts and circumstances. Estate of Wallace v. Commissioner, supra at 553; Paula Constr. Co. v. Commissioner, 58 T.C. 1055, 1058-1059 (1972), affd. without published opinion 474 F.2d 1345 (5th Cir. 1973). The burden is on petitioner to show that it is entitled to a compensation deduction larger than that allowed by respondent. Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011