Joseph W. Dorn - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          petitioner had unreported income of $194,354 from pension                   
          distributions in 1987.                                                      
          C.   The Prior Proceedings Relating to Petitioner’s 1990-91 Tax             
               Years                                                                  
               Petitioner filed a timely Request for a Collection Due                 
          Process Hearing, Form 12153.  Respondent held a hearing in this             
          case on May 1, 2000, and February 13, 2003.  Petitioner contended           
          at those hearings that he is not liable for tax on any of the               
          funds distributed from his pension plan because, he contended,              
          his former wife had received those funds under a qualified                  
          domestic relations order (QDRO).  He also contended that taxes              
          had already been withheld from the pension distribution.                    
          Petitioner had the opportunity at the hearing on February 13,               
          2003, to present evidence supporting his QDRO claim.  However, he           
          offered no evidence showing the amount of funds distributed by              
          the pension plan to his former spouse, and he did not explain why           
          the amount she was to receive under the court order ($135,881)              
          differed from the amount the Form 1099 shows the pension plan               
          distributed to petitioner ($194,354).                                       
               Respondent prepared an initial report on May 22, 2000, and a           
          supplemental report on April 4, 2003, in which respondent                   
          rejected petitioner’s QDRO claim.  Trial was held after issuance            
          of respondent’s first report and before issuance of respondent’s            
          second report.  At trial, petitioner did not offer any evidence             
          showing the amount of funds distributed by the pension plan to              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011