- 2 - petitioners' Federal income tax for 1997 and a penalty under section 6662(a) in the amount of $3,164. The issues for decision are: (1) Whether $55,000 of a $60,000 payment received by Rose M. Dorroh (petitioner) from her former employer during 1997 is excludable from gross income under section 104(a)(2), and (2) whether petitioners are liable for the penalty under section 6662(a).2 Some of the facts were stipulated. Those facts, with the annexed exhibits, are so found and are incorporated herein by reference. At the time the petition was filed, petitioners were legal residents of San Antonio, Texas.3 Petitioner was an employee of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), an agency in the U.S. Department of Defense. At the time her employment with that agency was mutually terminated during 1997, petitioner had completed 2 At trial, respondent conceded that $5,000, representing attorney's fees paid by petitioner in recovering the $60,000, is excludable from gross income pursuant to decisions of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to which this case would be appealable were it not a small tax case. Srivastava v. Commissioner, 220 F.3d 353, 365 (5th Cir. 2000), affg. in part, vacating and remanding in part T.C. Memo. 1998-362; Cotnam v. Commissioner, 263 F.2d 119 (5th Cir. 1959), affg. in part and revg. in part 28 T.C. 947 (1957); Golsen v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 742, 757 (1970), affd. 445 F.2d 985 (10th Cir. 1971). Additionally, petitioners conceded unreported interest income of $344. 3 Petitioners are husband and wife and filed a joint Federal income tax return for 1997. The principal issue, the $55,000, involves only Mrs. Dorroh.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011