- 7 - FINDINGS OF FACT Some of the facts have been stipulated; the stipulations and the stipulated exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference. When the petition was filed in the instant case, petitioners resided in Metairie, Louisiana. Metairie is in Jefferson Parish. Petitioners filed timely calendar year tax returns for the years in issue, using the filing status “married filing separate”.4 A. Michael’s Background Michael was born in 1963. He began working when he was 12. His jobs included cutting lawns and washing cars; he initially charged $5 per lawn and about $10 per car. Michael worked after school, on weekends, and throughout the summers. During high school, Michael continued to cut lawns; he also worked at Fasullo’s Drug Store. In addition, as part of his schooling, 4 After the notices of deficiency were mailed to petitioners, petitioners submitted Forms 1040X, Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for 1994 and 1995, in which they changed their filing status from “married filing separate” to “married filing joint” and claimed the earned income credit. Sec. 6013(b)(2)(C) prohibits spouses from making a joint return after they have previously filed separate returns if a notice of deficiency has been mailed to either spouse with respect to the tax for that taxable year, and the spouse has filed a petition with the Tax Court. See Phillips v. Commissioner, 86 T.C. 433 (1986), affd. in part and revd. in part 851 F.2d 1492 (D.C. Cir. 1988). At trial, petitioners conceded that their filing status is “married filing separate”. Consequently, they are not entitled to the earned income credit. See sec. 32(d).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011