- 3 - March 1989, and the Court issued its opinion on July 7, 1992.3 Most of the issues in the cases were resolved adversely to the Doyles. The deficiencies ultimately determined and assessed were as follows: Year Deficiency 1980 $31,854.92 1981 35,007.80 1982 25,209.22 1983 4,600.80 Additionally, respondent assessed more than $294,000 of interest on the deficiencies. In 1996, the Doyles filed another petition with this Court, docket No. 17325-96, seeking redetermination of an additional deficiency asserted by respondent on their 1983 return. The sole issue in that case was whether the statute of limitations barred the additional assessment. The parties stipulated to be bound by the result in a related case, docket No. 8309-96, in which the Court held that the period of limitations was still open. See Doyle v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-396, affd. without published opinion 202 F.3d 253 (3d Cir. 1999). Accordingly, on January 28, 1998, the Court entered a stipulated decision.4 On 3See Brown v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-379, affd. without published opinion sub nom. Konenkamp v. Commissioner, 14 F.3d 47 (3d Cir. 1993). 4This decision was subsequently affirmed. See Doyle v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-396, affd. without published opinion 202 F.3d 253 (3d Cir. 1999).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011