- 9 - With respect to the fraud penalty under section 6663(a) that respondent determined against petitioner for each of his taxable years 1990 and 1991, section 6663(a) imposes a penalty equal to 75 percent of the portion of any underpayment that is attribut- able to fraud. For purposes of section 6663(a), if the Commis- sioner of Internal Revenue (Commissioner) establishes that any portion of an underpayment is attributable to fraud, the entire underpayment is to be treated as attributable to fraud, except with respect to any portion of the underpayment that the taxpayer establishes by a preponderance of the evidence is not attribut- able to fraud. Sec. 6663(b). In order for the fraud penalty to apply, the Commissioner must prove by clear and convincing evidence, sec. 7454(a); Rule 142(b), that an underpayment exists and that some portion of such underpayment is attributable to fraud. Niedringhaus v. Commissioner, 99 T.C. 202, 210 (1992). To prove the existence of an underpayment, the Commissioner 5(...continued) from the IRS admitting to losing/misplacing Mr. Duncan’s and Duncan & Associates’ files. 6. Petitioner and legal counsel Mr. Fred Fore- man, former U.S. attorney [sic] for the 7th District, requested on numerous occasions amounts due and owing the IRS for tax years 1990 and 1991 only to be told that cases involving fraud or allegations of fraud could not be paid until concluded. We note that the so-called mitigating circumstances quoted above in paragraph 2 of petitioner’s response is inconsistent with petitioner’s petition in which he alleges that his records for the years at issue “were discarded due to their age”.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011