William T. Elliott - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
          The decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court,            
          and this opinion should not be cited as authority.                          
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $2,530 in petitioner’s           
          Federal income tax for 2000.  The only issue for decision is                
          whether petitioner is entitled to the earned income credit he               
          claimed.1                                                                   
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by reference.  At the time the petition was             
          filed petitioner resided in Corpus Christi, Texas.                          
               In 2000, petitioner lived with Glennie Huff and her two                
          sons, Ashton Huff and Marquin Huff.  Petitioner and Ms. Huff were           
          never married in an official marriage ceremony, nor were they               
          issued a valid marriage license.  Petitioner is not the                     
          biological father of Ashton or Marquin, and no State placed them            
          with him as foster children.                                                
               Petitioner filed his Federal income tax return as head of              
          household claiming dependency exemption deductions for Ashton and           
          Marquin and an earned income credit naming Ashton and Marquin as            
          qualifying children.  Respondent issued a notice of deficiency              


               1 The Court need not address whether petitioner is entitled            
          to head of household filing status or dependency exemption                  
          deductions because, with the standard deduction and a single                
          personal exemption, petitioner had zero taxable income and zero             
          tax liability for the year in issue.  As a result, neither                  
          petitioner's filing status nor any deductions bear on the outcome           
          of this case.                                                               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011