- 8 - settlement agreement stated that ProGuard would pay to petitioner $65,000 with additional amounts to be paid beginning 1 year from the settlement. In addition, the settlement agreement provided that ProGuard was to forgive, in equal amounts over 5 years, the $128,424.60 that was owed by petitioner. The $65,000 cash payment and $25,684.92 of debt forgiveness that was received by petitioner in 1998 are referred to as the settlement amount. At the time of settlement, the defendants did not report a personal injury claim to their insurance company to cover the cost. On October 13, 1998, petitioner and the defendants filed a stipulation, permitting petitioner to file a second amended complaint. Simultaneously, petitioner filed the second amended complaint adding a cause of action for negligence. The negligence cause of action claimed that the defendants owed to petitioner a duty of care as “not to exacerbate” petitioner’s diabetic condition. Petitioner claimed that the defendants created “intolerably stressful working conditions” by harassing petitioner while he was working, inducing him to work long days, threatening to terminate his employment, and threatening to reduce petitioner’s capital interest. Petitioner alleged that this stress exacerbated his diabetic condition resulting in a “deterioration in his overall health and a reduction in his life expectancy”.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011