Calvin L. Eubanks - Page 8




                                        - 7 -                                         
          State Farm, as petitioner has never challenged the income                   
          reported on the Form 1099 issued by Dunn.2                                  
               According to petitioner, he was surprised when he received             
          the notice of lien that indicated his 1992 liability exceeded               
          $10,000.  He now claims that he only agreed to the income and tax           
          reported on his 1992 return because he was under the impression             
          that the liability reported on the return constituted his entire            
          liability for that year.  As noted, the liability reported on his           
          1992 return does not include interest, additions to tax, or                 
          penalties.  The liability reflected in the notice of lien does.             
               Petitioner claims that he only agreed to report the income             
          shown on the Form 1099 issued by State Farm because he thought              
          that he could afford to pay the resultant Federal income tax                
          liability through the installment agreement.  He claims that                
          respondent, in effect, violated the terms of the installment                
          agreement by subsequently demanding a higher monthly payment than           
          originally agreed.                                                          
               Petitioner now takes the position that the income reported             
          on the Form 1099 issued by State Farm was actually paid to W.H.Y.           
          He admits that he received the check, but claims that he turned             
          it over to officials of W.H.Y.  He further claims that he did not           

               2 Petitioner argued at trial that he was not required to               
          file a 1992 Federal income tax return because of the amount of              
          income he earned during that year.  Even were we to consider only           
          the uncontested income reported on the Form 1099 issued by Dunn,            
          this argument would fail.  See sec. 6012(a).                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011