H. Robert Feinberg - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          offer that was made available to some other taxpayers.  We hold             
          that he is not entitled to the benefits of that settlement offer.           
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulated facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated             
          by this reference.2  H. Robert Feinberg (petitioner) resided in             
          New York, New York, at the time he filed the petition in this               
          case.                                                                       
          A.  The Plastics Recycling Transaction                                      
               This case is part of the Plastics Recycling group of cases.            
          The issues in this group of cases center about a circular                   
          multistep transaction involving the sale and lease of machines              
          designed to recycle plastic scrap.  The additions to tax arise              
          from the disallowance of losses, investment credits, and energy             
          credits petitioner claimed with respect to a New York limited               
          partnership called SAB Foam Recycling Associates (SAB Foam).                
               For a detailed discussion of the transactions involved in              
          the Plastics Recycling cases, see Provizer v. Commissioner, T.C.            


               2  The parties have stipulated that testimony and                      
          documentary evidence admitted in Cohen v. Commissioner, T.C.                
          Memo. 2003-303, and in Lewin v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-              
          305, shall be admitted in the present case, subject to the                  
          parties’ relevance objections, if any.  In addition, the parties            
          have agreed to add to the record as exhibits the testimony of               
          Elliot Miller in Provizer v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-177,             
          affd. per curiam without published opinion 996 F.2d 1216 (6th               
          Cir. 1993), and of Stuart Becker in Jaroff v. Commissioner, T.C.            
          Memo. 1996-527.                                                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011