- 11 - The regulation provides that the Commissioner will consider any information provided by the taxpayer that is relevant to the determination, including, but not limited to, the taxpayer’s age, ability to earn, responsibility for dependents, and the amount reasonably necessary for basic living expenses. See id. Petitioner argues, without relevant authority or persuasive reason, that respondent bears the burden of negating petitioner’s economic hardship claim and that respondent must conduct an independent investigation into petitioner’s financial affairs. Respondent argues that an attorney drawing $130,000 a year from his law firm has sufficient income to meet basic living expenses. Petitioner did not provide evidence of hardship during respondent’s decisionmaking process. At trial, petitioner submitted only his own testimony, in response to leading questions from his counsel, as to certain of his monthly expenses. His listed outlays include tax liabilities for prior years as well as alimony to Ms. Trevino. Petitioner also asserts that his monthly expenses include payments on a debt to American Express in excess of $100,000. Petitioner did not provide bills, bank statements, or other evidence to corroborate his testimony. He did not provide financial information for his current spouse. It is unclear whether his outlays are reasonable living expenses or are simply debts for his prior lifestyle. Overall, petitioner’s situation is totally dissimilar from otherPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011