- 7 - Deloitte Haskins & Sells and that Deloitte Haskins & Sells has substantial legal obligations to Mr. Forste. A few of these rights are listed below. 1. We believe Mr. Forste has a cause of action against Deloitte Haskins & Sells for breach of contract. He came to your firm with the clear understanding that he could not fly in an airplane. Based upon that understanding, he gave his most productive years of his career and because of a change of thinking he is now put in a position where he will enter into the job market at an advanced age with far less attractiveness to a prospective employer. 2. We believe Mr. Forste has a cause of action against your firm for misrepresentation based upon the promise that his inability to fly in an airplane would not hinder his employment with Deloitte Haskins & Sells. 3. We believe if Mr. Forste is to be terminated, such termination should be based upon a certifiable material disability, to wit his fear of flying. We believe your firm is under the duty, pursuant to Federal law, to make all reasonable accomodations [sic] to provide for this disability. Failure to do this subjects your firm to substantial liability to Mr. Forste as well as to federal agencies. 4. We believe that Mr. Forste has a substantial cause of action for the intentional and/or negligent infliction of mental distress. Your firm has constantly subjected Mr. Forste and his family to fear of loss of job and security because of his inability to fly in an airplane. 5. We believe that the procedural provisions of the contract between your firm and Mr. Forste regarding termination of employment have not been satisfied and would have to be satisfied before Mr. Forste could be terminated. Following DHS’s receipt of this letter, it informed Mr. Forste that he would have to deal with Mike Cook, the chief operating officer or number two man in DHS. Mr. Forste wrote aPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011