- 7 -
Deloitte Haskins & Sells and that Deloitte Haskins &
Sells has substantial legal obligations to Mr. Forste.
A few of these rights are listed below.
1. We believe Mr. Forste has a cause of action
against Deloitte Haskins & Sells for breach of
contract. He came to your firm with the clear
understanding that he could not fly in an airplane.
Based upon that understanding, he gave his most
productive years of his career and because of a change
of thinking he is now put in a position where he will
enter into the job market at an advanced age with far
less attractiveness to a prospective employer.
2. We believe Mr. Forste has a cause of action
against your firm for misrepresentation based upon the
promise that his inability to fly in an airplane would
not hinder his employment with Deloitte Haskins &
Sells.
3. We believe if Mr. Forste is to be terminated,
such termination should be based upon a certifiable
material disability, to wit his fear of flying. We
believe your firm is under the duty, pursuant to
Federal law, to make all reasonable accomodations [sic]
to provide for this disability. Failure to do this
subjects your firm to substantial liability to Mr.
Forste as well as to federal agencies.
4. We believe that Mr. Forste has a substantial
cause of action for the intentional and/or negligent
infliction of mental distress. Your firm has
constantly subjected Mr. Forste and his family to fear
of loss of job and security because of his inability to
fly in an airplane.
5. We believe that the procedural provisions of
the contract between your firm and Mr. Forste regarding
termination of employment have not been satisfied and
would have to be satisfied before Mr. Forste could be
terminated.
Following DHS’s receipt of this letter, it informed Mr.
Forste that he would have to deal with Mike Cook, the chief
operating officer or number two man in DHS. Mr. Forste wrote a
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011