Louis Fusaro - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          was exempt property, and petitioner’s interest in the pension               
          plan was not treated as an asset in the bankruptcy case.  On                
          October 30, 2000, petitioner received a discharge in bankruptcy.            
          Appeals Office Hearing                                                      
               On November 30, 2000, the Commissioner mailed to petitioner            
          a Final Notice - Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your                
          Right to a Hearing (notice of levy).  The notice of levy was                
          mailed to petitioner at an address in Los Angeles, California.              
          Petitioner timely filed a Form 12153, Request for a Collection              
          Due Process Hearing (hearing).  In the request, petitioner                  
          challenged the notice of levy stating:                                      
                    The taxpayer filed a chapter 7 bankruptcy petition                
               on July 19, 2000 * * * taxpayer received a discharge on                
               October 30, 2000.  The federal tax lien recorded in                    
               Florida in 1996 may not now be used to levy on                         
               Mr. Fusaro’s property. * * *                                           
               Petitioner’s request for hearing was assigned to Appeals               
          Officer William Hsieh (Hsieh).  Prior to the hearing, on                    
          February 16, 2001, petitioner’s representative, who was also his            
          bankruptcy attorney, Wesley H. Avery (Avery), mailed a letter to            
          Hsieh describing petitioner’s position as follows:                          
                    In order to have a perfected security interest in                 
               the Pension Plan, prepetition the IRS would have had to                
               file a Notice of Tax Lien in the one office within the                 
               state, as designated by the laws of such state, in                     
               which the property subject to the lien is situated.                    
               * * * Under California law, which is the situs of the                  
               Pension Plan, it was necessary for the IRS to file                     
               prepetition a Notice of Federal Tax Lien with the                      
               California Secretary of State. * * * However, the IRS                  
               failed to file prepetition a federal tax lien against                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011